Difference
(minor diff, author diff)
Added Changed Deleted

  • Prior major revision
  • Current Revision



     
     
     
    knowledge of facts, events, or phenomena, as explained,
    accounted for, or produced, by means of powers, causes,
    or laws. Pure science is the knowledge of these powers,
    causes, or laws, considered apart, or as pure from all
    applications. Both these terms have a similar and
    special signification when applied to the science of
    quantity; as, the applied and pure mathematics. Exact
    science is knowledge so systematized that prediction
    and verification, by measurement, experiment,
    observation, etc., are possible. The mathematical and
    physical sciences are called the exact sciences.
     
    The public understanding of the ''scientific method'' as the core of science has been replaced, in our time, with the ''body of knowledge'' being the core of science. This has lead to a misunderstanding between those who perform science and those who casually learn of the results of science. Those who perform science, necessarily understand the implications of science as a method - chiefly, the notion that one performs experiments to discern fact from illusion, and the notion that old knowledge is easily supplanted by new experimental results. Those that casually learn of the results of science, through the course of media outlets, or even some "popular science" books, may miss the implications of ''science as a method'' in the process of learning about ''science as a body of knowledge''. The misunderstanding of this key distinction leads, for some, to the idea of some sort of "magic" (distinct, of course, from magick) involved with science and what it discovers.
     
     
    '''Our scientific capabilities have outrun ''scientific method'' as the core of science has been replaced, in our spiritual capabilities.''',, the ''body of knowledge'' being the core of science. This has lead to a misunderstanding between those who perform science and those who casually learn of the results of science. Those who perform science, necessarily understand the implications of science as a method - chiefly, the notion that one performs experiments to discern fact from illusion, and the notion that old knowledge is easily supplanted by new experimental results. Those that casually learn of the results of science, through the course of media outlets, or even some "popular science" books, may miss the implications of ''science as a method'' in the process of learning about ''science as a body of knowledge''. The misunderstanding of this key distinction leads, for some, to the idea of some sort of "magic" (distinct, of course, from magick) involved with science and what it discovers.